I am a bit disappointed by the article. It's hard to find what points do you make? Of course, people jobs will be affected by AI. And Goldman Sachs will be replaced by P2P network of AIs, which help people make decision without all those layers of people working there.

I am pretty sure those clerks will go out before programmers.

As for now, the AI we witness is just a superlarge associative memory for human knowledge. Next level of fusion of the knowledge. It can't really produce anything novel.

Of course, programmers also for 95% do not produce anything novel. That is, there is a lot of fat there.

Will AI play a Tower of Babel role in programming bringing some kind of uniformity into how we program and ultimate code reuse? We will see.